Monday, March 31, 2008
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Learning to be a human *being* again
I’ve been busy lately, busier than I’ve been in a long time. Between a fulltime job, freelance work, and an eight-week-old, life is fuller than I ever imagined it could be. Besides missing all of the sleep I used to get, I find myself missing the work that I used to do on Opus. Simply put, I miss writing honest-to-God music and movie reviews, and not just little blog entries about this or that release. I miss diving into an album or film, exploring it as I write about it, using the reviewing process as a way to contemplate and ultimately, better understand the media that I seek out, consume, and experience.It felt incredibly refreshing to post my first music review in over a month. But all of the work I’ve been doing lately has meant that such writing is the exception, and not the rule. But there is a light at the end of the tunnel, or at least the first faint few glimmers. Several projects will be coming to completion in the next week or so, freeing me up for more personal work, including more writing, a redesign that has been in development for several months now, and a project that has been nearly a year in the making.Beyond that, the future looks a little more wide open, a little more unknown. And that’s a very good feeling right now.Source
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Pineapple Express Soundtrack to Feature a Rap Song by Shaq
Friday, March 28, 2008
Cloverfield DVD Giveaway: The Cloverfield Monster on Your TV!
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Learning to be a human *being* again
I’ve been busy lately, busier than I’ve been in a long time. Between a fulltime job, freelance work, and an eight-week-old, life is fuller than I ever imagined it could be. Besides missing all of the sleep I used to get, I find myself missing the work that I used to do on Opus. Simply put, I miss writing honest-to-God music and movie reviews, and not just little blog entries about this or that release. I miss diving into an album or film, exploring it as I write about it, using the reviewing process as a way to contemplate and ultimately, better understand the media that I seek out, consume, and experience.It felt incredibly refreshing to post my first music review in over a month. But all of the work I’ve been doing lately has meant that such writing is the exception, and not the rule. But there is a light at the end of the tunnel, or at least the first faint few glimmers. Several projects will be coming to completion in the next week or so, freeing me up for more personal work, including more writing, a redesign that has been in development for several months now, and a project that has been nearly a year in the making.Beyond that, the future looks a little more wide open, a little more unknown. And that’s a very good feeling right now.Source
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
newsflash
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Trailer: Meet Dave — Then Swiftly Walk Away
Monday, March 24, 2008
Box Office: Guess ‘Who’ Won the Weekend?
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Saturday, March 22, 2008
..whisper sweet string theories into my ear..
so, skipping out on the punctuation thing again. i'm feeling feisty. well, not really. actually i'm feeling... like an anthill. calm exterior surface, busy hive of activity underneath. i'm going to write the next thing in the interests of posterity. not shock value. and honestly, it's not so shocking in this day and age. but, i was pleasuring myself earlier today, and just near the moment of shangri-la i found myself imagining my imaginary female partner gasping out the intricacies of quantum physics in between heaving shudders. i believe that was what pushed me over the edge to sail aloft on thermal dynamic winds. this seriously rocked my boat. i think i'm going crazy. />movie review: just got back from seeing 'Drillbit Taylor'. the best two words one could use to sum up this film would be 'owen wilson'. OW being hired basically to play the character he plays best (namely himself) is usually always a safe bet if the film is comedy, which this one is. of note one of the writers is seth rogan and i can't help but draw parallels between the 3 main kids as being simply younger versions of the high schoolers from 'superbad'. i mean, it's so obvious really. tall skinny kid, heavy foul-mouthed kid, and lovable loser kid. it's as if rogan wanted to revisit those characters and show another angle on them just entering high school (instead of being at the end as in superbad).so, i liked the film. i enjoyed it. there's not a whole lot of depth, but there are some pretty feel good moments, and some really funny stuff. i mean, if you like OW, then you'll definitely like it, cause he's essentially reprising the same role he plays in almost every film he's done. and that's ok, cause I really like OW. and hell, he frickin gets a pinky cut off catching a samurai sword... that's pretty badass i have to admit.anyway, i'm moved in to my new basement. i'm a bit apprehensive about living with other people again, especially since i barely know them but i think it'll be ok for a while. i just value my privacy so we'll see if that is maintained. additionally i have an interview set up for next week. for level design. means i'll have to crash-course in UE4 (which i've been mentally reviewing in my head... most systems are a go i think). yeah, back into games possibly. no teaching, no climbing instruction, no moving to paris. is this really what i want?!? it's not what i said i wanted, for sure. but i figure i'll give it a year or so of saving, and then make a move again. do volunteering at the gym in the meantime, learn french, keep my eyes and ears peeled for the opportunities. i hope i'm not just backsliding =/Source
Friday, March 21, 2008
Volver and Delicious Cleavages
Again, like last night, I logged on with the intentions of writing a movie review ... and, again, it ain't gonna happen.Tonight we watched Volver, and I enjoyed it. It was quite unlike anything I've seen before. Penelope Cruz did some great work in the main role, and she was beautiful, besides. Click here and check out her visage on the movie's official poster and packaging ... like a young Sophia Loren, only prettier. She really was outstanding in the film.But my enjoyment of this Spanish-language film was hampered, even ruined at times, by some odd subtitles. Did I write odd? Downright friggin' weird is probably a better way to describe it. And the fact that the story itself is pretty weird only heightened my confusion. For instance, at one point, Penelope Cruz's character sings a song that is apparently called Volver. The lyrics to which oughta give the viewer an idea of the significance of the movie's title. But for some reason, the words of the song weren't included in the subtitles. It was a nice song, it sounded pretty, it clearly included the word "Volver," and I'd have liked to know what it was all about. So I was distracted and a little frustrated by that.So rather than write the movie review I'd wanted to write, I've been fruitlessly looking around the net for a translation of the lyrics, although I can't be sure what the song is called in Spanish. A guy ought not have to do this kind of thing after the fact in order to better feel that he enjoyed a movie.I've put the disc in the PC to show you some of what I'm talking about ...At another point in the movie, Penelope's character (who is running a restaurant) complements her barmaid on her drink-mixing skills:
To which the barmaid responds:
I, uh... well, OK. I think I know what you mean, and I might even agree, but ... uh ... what?I don't think that's technically incorrect translating ... but it sure is a bit odd. It's not as odd, of course, as the infamous Chinese bootleg subtitles for Star Wars:
But it was a bit off-putting, nonetheless.Anyway, once I got past the subtitle issue and just tried to enjoy the movie, I did enjoy it. Now, it is an odd movie. It's very strange. The story involves attempted rape and murder and someone who may or may not be a ghost. And it's one of those movies that features a number of heroic and/or sympathetic female characters and a pack of lecherous, disgusting male characters. And I think I mentioned the subtitle issue.But, in spite of all that, the movie is more good than bad. Cinematically, it's really very good. All the critics I had heard were right about two things: Penelope Cruz turns in an outstanding performance, and the movie's visual pallet is beautiful.And Penelope makes for some dang nice eye-candy, besides.So see Volver if you're in the mood for something a bit odd with no likable male characters and some weird subtitles. If I were gonna write a full-on review, I'd probably give it three out of four stars.Source
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Interesting analysis suggesting that blogging and the internet has created a literate youth culture!
What's the matter with kids today?http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/03/14/kids_and_internet/Nothing, actually. Aside from our panic that the Internet is melting their brains.By Amy GoldwasserMarch 14, 2008 | The other week was only the latest takedown of what has become a fashionable segment of the population to bash: the American teenager. A phone (land line!) survey of 1,200 17-year-olds, conducted by the research organization Common Core and released Feb. 26, found our young people to be living in "stunning ignorance" of history and literature.This furthered the report that the National Endowment for the Arts came out with at the end of 2007, lamenting "the diminished role of voluntary reading in American life," particularly among 13-to-17-year-olds, and Doris Lessing's condemnation, in her acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize in literature, of "a fragmenting culture" in which "young men and women ... have read nothing, knowing only some specialty or other, for instance, computers."Kids today -- we're telling you! -- don't read, don't write, don't care about anything farther in front of them than their iPods. The Internet, according to 88-year-old Lessing (whose specialty is sturdy typewriters, or perhaps pens), has "seduced a whole generation into its inanities."Or is it the older generation that the Internet has seduced -- into the inanities of leveling charges based on fear, ignorance and old-media, multiple-choice testing? So much so that we can't see that the Internet is only a means of communication, and one that has created a generation, perhaps the first, of writers, activists, storytellers? When the world worked in hard copy, no parent or teacher ever begrudged teenagers who disappeared into their rooms to write letters to friends -- or a movie review, or an editorial for the school paper on the first president they'll vote for. Even 15-year-old boys are sharing some part of their feelings with someone out there.We're talking about 33 million Americans who are fluent in texting, e-mailing, blogging, IM'ing and constantly amending their profiles on social network sites -- which, on average, 30 of their friends will visit every day, hanging out and writing for 20 minutes or so each. They're connected, they're collaborative, they're used to writing about themselves. In fact, they choose to write about themselves, on their own time, rather than its being a forced labor when a paper's due in school. Regularly, often late at night, they're generating a body of intimate written work. They appreciate the value of a good story and the power of a speech that moves: Ninety-seven percent of the teenagers in the Common Core survey connected "I have a dream" with its speaker -- they can watch Dr. King deliver it on demand -- and eight in 10 knew what "To Kill a Mockingbird" is about.This is, of course, the kind of knowledge we should be encouraging. The Internet has turned teenagers into honest documentarians of their own lives -- reporters embedded in their homes, their schools, their own heads.But this is also why it's dangerous, why we can't seem to recognize that it's just a medium. We're afraid. Our kids know things we don't. They drove the presidential debates onto YouTube and very well may determine the outcome of this election. They're texting at the dinner table and responsible for pretty much every enduring consumer cultural phenomenon: iPod, iTunes, iPhone; Harry Potter, "High School Musical"; large hot drinks with gingerbread flavoring. They can sell ads on their social network pages, and they essentially made MySpace worth $580 million and "Juno" an Oscar winner.Besides, we're tired of having to ask them every time we need to find Season 2 of "Heroes," calculate a carbon footprint or upload photos to Facebook (now that we're allowed on).Plus, they're blogging about us.So we've made the Internet one more thing unknowable about the American teenager, when, really, it's one of the few revelations. We conduct these surveys and overgeneralize -- labeling like the mean girls, driven by the same jealousy and insecurity.Common Core drew its multiple-choice questions for teens from a test administered by the federal government in 1986. Twenty-plus years ago, high school students didn't have the Internet to store their trivia. Now they know that the specific dates and what-was-that-prince's-name will always be there; they can free their brains to go a little deeper into the concepts instead of the copyrights, step back and consider what Scout and Atticus were really fighting for. To criticize teenagers' author-to-book title matching on the spot, over the phone, is similar to cold-calling over-40s and claiming their long-division skills or date of "Jaws" recall is rusty. This is what we all rely on the Internet for.That's not to say some of the survey findings aren't disturbing. It's crushing to hear that one in four teens could not identify Adolf Hitler's role in world history, for instance. But it's not because teenagers were online that they missed this. Had a parent introduced 20 minutes of researching the Holocaust to one month of their teen's Internet life, or a teacher assigned "The Diary of Anne Frank" (arguably a 13-year-old girl's blog) -- if we worked with, rather than against, the way this generation voluntarily takes in information -- we might not be able to pick up the phone and expose tragic pockets of ignorance.The average teen chooses to spend an average of 16.7 hours a week reading and writing online. Yet the NEA report did not consider this to be "voluntary" reading and writing. Its findings also concluded that "literary reading declined significantly in a period of rising Internet use." The corollary is weak -- this has as well been a period of rising franchises of frozen yogurt that doesn't taste like frozen yogurt, of global warming, of declining rates of pregnancy and illicit drug use among teenagers, and of girls sweeping the country's most prestigious high school science competition for the first time.Teenagers today read and write for fun; it's part of their social lives. We need to start celebrating this unprecedented surge, incorporating it as an educational tool instead of meeting it with punishing pop quizzes and suspicion.We need to start trusting our kids to communicate as they will online -- even when that comes with the risk that they'll spill the family secrets or campaign for a candidate who's not ours.Once we stop regarding the Internet as a villain, stop presenting it as the enemy of history and literature and worldly knowledge, then our teenagers have the potential to become the next great voices of America. One of them, 70 years from now, might even get up there to accept the very award Lessing did -- and thank the Internet for making him or her a writer and a thinker.Source
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Yub Nub!
I received an unprecedented number of e-mails after I sent a message to my e-list that declared: "It was in fact the Ewoks that made Return of the Jedi the BEST STAR WARS MOVIE EVER." Apparently, them's fightin' words. A sampling of replies:* It's just such a blatant, throw-down provocation. Ewoks blow. And you know it.* Oh, where to begin? *Shakes head sorrowfully.** Well, the Ewoks did take down the Imperial forces with "primitive" technology, which was pretty cool. But I suspect the only reason why you hold the Ewoks (and, subsequently, the whole movie) in such high esteem is that THEY WORSHIPPED A GAY ROBOT. And for that fact alone will you ignore any and all arguments against Return of the Jedi, so I will not try.But then an astute friend pointed out:Did you know that the Ewok language was in fact based on a dialect in the Philippines? So—it would make sense to me, your love of Ewoks, because of their inherent linguistic familiarity via pan-API connections.Yeah! That's it!But, seriously, folks, the first piece of writing that I ever got published was a movie review of Return of the Jedi, which I wrote when I was in the fifth grade and which got printed in my elementary school's newsletter. The other kids were in awe of me because I had actually seen the movie on opening weekend—waited in a long line and everything! I gave it a 10 out of 10 because it was—up until that point—pretty much the greatest experience of my life. Then I discovered masturbation, and everything changed.But back during those innocent days, I went to see Jedi over and over, collected the action figures, played the arcade game, read the novel tie-in, bought related merchandise, and listened to that damn catchy Ewok song repeatedly—even calling up the radio station to request it, much to the chagrin of hip DJs, I'm sure.You know what? I still love those goddman Ewoks. I still get excited by the Endor forest speeder bike chase. I still get scared when Luke gets chased by the rancor beast. I still cheer when Princess Leia chokes Jabba the Hut to death and still get giddy when she declares her love to Han Solo. And I still cry when Darth Vader throws the Emperor down the reactor shaft to save his son. Yes, I cried then, and I cry now. If that moment doesn't tug at your heart, you probably have no soul. And that's all I have to say about Return of the Jedi, the BEST STAR WARS MOVIE EVER.Ah, sweet memories: Sing along, bitches!:Yub nubeee chop yub nubah toe meet toe pee-chee keeneg'noop dock fling oh ahYah waheee chop yah wahah toe meet toe pee-chee keeneg'noop dock fling oh ahCoatee chah tu yub nubcoatee chah tu yahwahcoatee chah tu glowahallay loo ta nuvGlowaheee chop glowahya glowah pee chu nee foamah toot dee awe goon daaCoatee cha tu goo (Yub nub!)coatee cha tu doo (Yahwah!)coatee cha tu too (Ya chaa!)allay loo ta nuvallay loo ta nuvallay loo ta nuvGlowaheee chop glowahya glowah pee chu nee foamah toot dee awe goon daaTuesday, March 18, 2008
Underworld 3 Ups the Production Budget
Monday, March 17, 2008
Saturday, March 15, 2008
March 16, 2008 -- Contents
SUNDAY MARCH 16 CONTENTS(1) The Sunday Photos(2) The Sunday Conversion(3) The Sunday Shell Game(4) The Sunday Travel Section(5) The Sunday Salute(6) The Sunday FunniesNOTE: For the Sunday, see Publius Pundit. If you've seen the film or not, feel free to leave your thoughts/reactions as a comment. Only related to Russia because we say so.Thanks for reading La Russophobe !Source
Friday, March 14, 2008
Thursday, March 13, 2008
SXSW Blog: Geek Movies, Kristen Bell and Other Diversions
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
New Images from Tropic Thunder — More Blackface Downey Jr!
Paramount Pictures has released a slue of pictures from ShoWest in Las Vegas, and since I am currently in Austin for South by Southwest, I am of course working on that instead of finishing my review of Forgetting Sarah Marshall. This first update includes two great new looks at Ben Stiller’s Tropic Thunder, which as you will remember, stars Robert Downey Jr. as a pretensious actor whose part was originally written for a black man, so he dyes his skin to fit the part.As I said before, I am getting more and more excited about this comedy as the marketing campaign begins to gear up. Consider this just the next step in the building of my excitement. I say bring on the ridiculous premise! Take a look at the new pictures below.(Click to Enlarge)
Tropic Thunder hits theaters on August 15th.Related Reading:Tropic Thunder Teases OnlineFirst Look: Robert Downey Jr as Black Man in ‘Tropic Thunder’Tom Cruise Rocks a Fat Suit for Stiller’s ‘Tropic Thunder’SXSW: Forgetting Sarah MarshallNew German Iron Man Movie Poster!Two New Iron Man Posters!New Iron Man Photos: Tony Stark - “Pimpin’ Ain’t Easy”New Iron Man Trailer Will Rock You!

Source
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Monday, March 10, 2008
Movie Review Monday!!!
Well peeps, it is that time of the week again movie review Monday! I watched 4 new films this week. One was outstanding, one was good, one was boring as all heck and one was SO bad I am ashamed to admit I watched it! LOL Lets start with the good one.. Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee "Beginning just after the bloody Sioux victory over General Custer atLittle Big Horn, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee intertwines theperspectives of three characters: Charles Eastman (Beach), né Ohiyesa,a young, Dartmouth-educated, Sioux doctor held up as living proof ofthe alleged success of assimilation; Sitting Bull (Schellenberg), theproud Lakota chief who refuses to submit to U.S. government policiesdesigned to strip his people of their identity, their dignity and theirsacred land - the gold-laden Black Hills of the Dakotas; and SenatorHenry Dawes (Quinn), who was one of the architects of the governmentpolicy on Indian affairs. While Eastman and patrician schoolteacherElaine Goodale (Paquin) work to improve life for the Indians on thereservation, Senator Dawes lobbies President Grant (Thompson) for morehumane treatment, opposing the bellicose stance of General WilliamTecumseh Sherman (Feore). Hope rises for the Indians in the form of theprophet Wovoka (Studi) and the Ghost Dance - a messianic movement thatpromises an end of their suffering under the white man. This hope isobliterated after the assassination of Sitting Bull and the massacre ofhundreds of Indian men, women and children by the 7th Cavalry atWounded Knee Creek on Dec. 29, 1890." I really enjoyed this film. I am really drawn to the history of Native Americans/Canadians. My grandmother is part Ojibwa, so the history holds a special place in my heart. I would definitely recommend this film! Lets move on to the BAD BAD film! LOL... Carver "Based on a true story, Carver depicts the real life events of five20-something's that went camping in the mountain town of Halcyon Ridgeand never returned." Now let me say first that I do not believe for one nano second that this movie was based on true events. Now I like a good slasher movie, the cheesy, gory ones. Heck I liked Saw and Hostel, that being said this movie was SO over the top, SO gory and gross, So bad that I spent a ton of time hiding under my blanket feeling nauseated. :( STAY AWAY for this movie, seriously..heed my warning.. LOL OK I am getting grossed out just thinking about it... On to the next movie.. Michael Clayton"Michael Clayton is an in-house fixer at one of thelargest corporate law firms in New York. A former criminal prosecutor,Clayton takes care of Kenner, Bach, & Ledeen's dirtiest work at thebehest of the firm's co-founder, Marty Bach. Though burned out andhardly content with his job as a fixer, his divorce, a failed businessventure, and mounting debt have left Clayton inextricably tied to thefirm. At U/North, meanwhile, the career of litigator Karen Crowderrests on the multi-million dollar settlement of a class-action suitthat Clayton's firm is leading to a seemingly successful conclusion.But when Kenner Bach's brilliant and guilt-ridden attorney Arthur Edenssabotages the U/North case, Clayton faces the biggest challenge of hiscareer and his life" So we finally got around to watching this one and found it just boring. I am not really crazy for John Grisham like movies and that is what this movie reminded both DH and I of. To be honest I am actually kind of confused as to why this what up as a "Best Picture" and why the actress won "Best supporting" Neither struck me as being particularly outstanding. I am going to give this one a thumbs down! My last movie for today is... Love In The Time Of Cholera "Florentino (Bardem), rejected by the beautiful Fermina (Mezzogiorno) ata young age, devotes much of his adult life to carnal affairs as adesperate attempt to heal his broken heart." I thought this movie was OUTSTANDING, so much so that I will be adding it to my all time fav list!! The story was fabulous, the look, the feel, the sound of the movie..all gorgeous and lush and beautiful. It's a fairly long move at 2 hours and 18 minutes, but I was never bored and the time flew by. I've haven't read the book yet so I don't know how it compares to that, but I am giving this movie two huge thumbs up! Oh and on a funny side note.. I was watching this movie alone because DH wanted to play his World Of Warcraft and thought it sounded like a "girl" movie. About 20 mins into the movie, he moved onto the sofa so he could watch the movie while he played. LMAO Ok folks, that is it for this weeks movie reviews! I'll be back tomorrow with my new LO for challenge #5 of the ADSR and a few more pictures from our walk on Saturday! Until next time..TATA!!Source
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Is Black and white a provoking film by Subhash Ghai?
RATE THE MOVIE Black and White (BW) Rating: *** For a filmmaker who scaled Bollywood's heights as the quintessential Sapnon ka Saudagar to suddenly shift gear is indeed a valiant bid. And Subhash Ghai deserves kudos for daring this switch in the high noon of his career, since experimentation is generally the forte of GenXers and Bratpack dreamers. Suddenly, and surprisingly, Ghai sets aside the grandeur of films like Ram Lakhan, Khalnayak to step into the difficult terrain of cinema verite. And no, he doesn't flounder and fall flat, despite a few loose strands and false notes that hold back the film from becoming a searing document of our tumultuous times. Black and White is a thought-provoking film that challenges the state's stereotypical formula to combat terrorism. And somewhere between its moments of light and shade, it holds a glimmer of hope and humanism: yes, fanatics can be cured, terrorists can be tamed, secularism may live long. The story is ostensibly based on the headline-grabbing case of the terrorist attack on Parliament, when a Delhi University professor (SAR Geelani) was held responsible for his links with the terrorists. Like Geelani, Professor Rajan Mathur (Anil Kapoor) too teaches Urdu in Zakir Hussain College and unwittingly becomes associated with a suicide bomber (Anurag Sinha) who comes all the way from Afghanistan to blow up the Red Fort on Independence Day. Nomair Qazi, the bomber, poses as a victim of the Gujarat riots and wins the sympathy of the professor and his activist wife (Shefali Shah), as he takes up residence with his supposed grandfather (Habib Tanvir) in the bustling by-lines of Chandni Chowk. The jehadi has fourteen days to plan his suicide mission and conveniently uses the simple professor and his emotionally exuberant wife to gain entry in the high-security environs of the Lal Qila. But before that, he must learn the more important lessons of life: Incredible India's all-encompassing Indianness (read bhangra, bhaichara, bonhomie). And what better place to experience the highs of a syncretic culture than Chandni Chowk, a standing testimonial to India's tolerant tehzeeb. Cut out the clumsy climax, the awkward activism of Shefali Shah, the fumbling romance with an all-eyes, duppata-laden student, the incoherent black and white birth-of-a-jehadi sequences in a shadowy Afghanistan and you'll end up with a stellar show by Anil Kapoor (completely restrained) and Habib Tanvir (veteran histrionics). Add to this the delicious smells and sounds of Chandni Chowk, deftly captured on camera by the director, and you might just believe the filmmaker when he says the world doesn't exist in black and white; there are colours -- and ideologies -- beyond extremes. A word about debutant Anurag Sinha: too linear a performance to impress. Surely, a terrorist doesn't wear a permanent scowl, specially when he is ostensibly trying to hide his antecedents and blend in with normal people. Do you agree with our film critic? Nikhat Kazmi, Film critic, The Times of India Rating Scale: *Poor, **Average, ***Good, ****Very Good, *****Outstanding PS: You may also SMS or email your views. Mail us on mytimesmyvoice@timesgroup.com with with short code for the movie name' mentioned in the subject line. To SMS, type MTMVREV, leave a space, type short code of the movie, leave a space, your rating 1/1.5/2/2.5/3/3.5/4/4.5/5. Add your name and comments, if any, and sms to 58888. Example: If you feel a movie is above 'Average' but not 'Good', rate it as 2.5
Source
Friday, March 7, 2008
Thursday, March 6, 2008
John Goodman & Joan Cusack join Isla Fisher in Shopaholic
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Monday, March 3, 2008
Movie Review Sunday
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)